THE FULL STORY OF HOW 'WAS undersold ITALY - READ AND TO TURN!
-di Antonella Randazzo

It was 1992, suddenly an entire political class collapsed under the blows of the judicial investigation. For over forty years it was in power. The Italians had long suspected that the political system was based on corruption and cronyism. But nothing had been able to scratch it. Neither the complaint nor the popular protests (sometimes bloodily suppressed), nor in cases of collusion with the Mafia, which occasionally rose to the chronicle. But then, suddenly, the system collapsed.

What had happened to make sure that Italians could have, unexpectedly, the satisfaction to see that their suspicions about the corruption of the political system were real?
While the focus of the Italians was focused on the bribery scandal, the Italian government was taking important decisions for the future of the country.
With the hurricane of "Tangentopoli" Italians believed he could start a better time for Italy. But in secret, the government was implementing policies that have worsened the country's future. Many companies will be sold off, even the Bank of Italy will be put on sale. The sell-off was called "privatization."
The year 1992 was a year of alarm and secrecy. The then Minister of Internal Affairs Vincenzo Scotti, March 16, issued a warning to all the prefects, fearing a series of attacks against the Italian democracy. The attacks were planned by Scotti events such as the killing of politicians or the abduction of the President of the Republic. The attacks were there, and were successful, but it was not the events planned by the Minister of Interior. The attack on democracy was much more hidden and destabilizing.

In May 1992, Giovanni Falcone was killed by the Mafia. He was investigating flows of dirty money, and the track was leading to results that could be connected to the mafia major international financial circuits. Falcone was also found that some characters prestigious Palermo were affiliated to some Masonic lodges of the Scottish Rite, which also belonged to several mafiosi, such as Giovanni Lo Cascio. The track ran parallel to that of the lodges of the financial circuits, and would have led to certain results, if Falcone had not been killed.
On Falcone had been spread calumnies that were trying to overturn the reality of a magistrate intact. People felt that the institutions had not protected. It also emerged during his funeral, when the police officers positioned themselves in front of the coffins, preventing anyone from approaching. Someone shouted: "Shame on you, you should be ashamed, you have to go away, do not you approach these coffins, these are not your own, these are our dead, only we have the right to grieve, you have only the duty to be ashamed of."
That the mafia were using methods to hit the whole country, in order to scare him and make him passively accept the "new course" of events, you will also see the attacks of 1993.

The terrorist attacks of 1993 had characteristics very similar to the terrorist attacks of the years of the "strategy of tension", and certainly were intended to frighten the country, to weaken it. On 4 May 1993 a car bomb explodes in Faure street in Rome's Parioli district. On May 27, another car bomb exploded in Via dei Georgofili in Florence, five people lost their lives. On the night between 27 and 28 July, still a car bomb explodes in via Palestro in Milan, killing five people. Those responsible were never identified, and it was said that the mafia wanted to "hit the national art", but it was never anything like this happened. The families of the victims and the judge Giuseppe Soresina will agree that those attacks had not been made only by the Mafia, but also by other characters from the "finest minds of the mafia". [1]
Falcone was a real opponent of the Mafia. His investigations went to Borsellino, who was assassinated two months later. Their death has decreed the triumph of a mafia system and criminal, that he would put his hands on the Italian economy, and forced the country into complete submission policy and finance.

While the Minister Scotti made ​​a statement that sounded almost like a threat: "the mafia will focus on objectives and more excellent and the fight will become more bloody, the mafia wants to destabilize the state and bend it to their will," Borsellino complained about rules and laws that did not allow a real fight against the mafia. He observed: "You can not deal with the power of the mafia when you make a gift as what was done with the new procedural instruments suitable to a country that is Italy and certainly not Sicily.'s New code in its appearance hearing, is a blunt instrument in the hands of those who should use. Each time, for example, you have to start over and prove that Cosa Nostra exists ". [2]
The methods of state sabotage of the struggle against the Mafia have been sued by numerous members of the judiciary. For example, May 27, 1992, the President of the Court of Caltanissetta Dall'Orto Placido, who had to deal with the investigation of the Capaci massacre, he found himself in serious trouble: "It's much worse than Fort Apache, we are in disarray. In a situation like ours, the fight against the Mafia is just an empty word, as we have said many times the CSM ". [3]
Even the prosecutor of Palermo, Roberto Scarpinato, in June 1992 he said: "On one side of the scale c 'is life on the other side there must be something that is worth the risk of life, I do not see in this package a commitment extraordinary by the State, for example I do not see anything extraordinary about hunting and capture of fugitives large ". [4]
In the same year, Senator Maurizio Calvi said that Falcone confessed to not trust the command of the police in Palermo, Palermo and even the police of the Prefecture of Palermo. [5]
That the murderers were not capable of all Italians, many suspected him.

The Minister Martelli, during a visit to South America, said: "I ​​am looking for links between the murder of Falcone and the American Mafia or the Colombian mafia". [6] The same Amato, chairman of the board, during a visit to Monaco, said: "Falcone was killed in Palermo but probably the murder was decided elsewhere. "
Probably, the techniques of investigation Falcone did not like the characters with which the Italian government had to do that year. Consider that the fight against the Mafia especially a moral and cultural, that engage people in the honesty and candor of the absence of compromise, he had earned the persecution of slander and methods typical of the British Secret Service and the United States. These methods aim to isolate and criminalize, trying to make it look the opposite of what it is. They tried to bring Falcone an accomplice of the Mafia. Antonino Caponnetto told the newspaper La Repubblica: "There is no denying that there has been a campaign (against Falcone), attended part of the magistrates, who has de-legitimized. There is nothing more dangerous to a magistrate who fight against the mafia that being isolated ". [7]
The murder of two symbols of the State as important as Falcone and Borsellino meant something new. Had been touched the strings of international power elite, and they bore witness to the brutal murders. This was also realized by Charles Rose, District Attorney of New York, who noted the peculiarity of the attacks: "Even the most ferocious boss of Cosa Nostra have ever wanted to hit the personality of the State as visible as it was John, because they know very well what risks involves a frontal attack on the state. terrorist that attack is an act of fear ... I think a mafia who starts shooting at symbols like the terrorists ... is doomed to lose the most valuable asset for any organization that criminal type, ie the active or passive complicity of the population within which it moves ". [8]
In fact, that year Italians realized that there was something new, and took to the streets against the Mafia. They formed two fronts: the common people against the mafia, and institutions, which were the elite subduing the coordination of international mafias.

That year, the Anglo-American elite would not only prevent the effective fight against the Mafia, but he wanted to make Italy a country completely subjugated to a criminal and mafia system that would dominate through the financial power.

As signaled the Senate president Giovanni Spadolini, there was in place a large scale operation to destroy Italian democracy: "The purpose of the mafia seems to be identical to that of terrorism in the most acute phase of the season of the years of lead: overwhelm the democratic state in our country. objective is always the same: to delegitimize the State, breaking the circle of trust between citizens and democratic power ... then if we perceive - and we have the right - some links around the international challenge mafia more terrorism, then we ask: but perhaps renew scenarios 12:00 to 11:00 years ago? threats centers of business and political conspiracy as the P2 are permanent in the democratic life of the Italian. piduista And there is a tradition that survives, we do not know with many others. Mafia and P2 are joined from the beginning, since each Sindona ". [9]
Even Tina Anselmi had understood the links between the Mafia and international finance: "We must be careful, very careful ... I talked to the old plan of democratic rebirth of Gelli and read it today confirm that startles. E 'in full effect ... Who has great resources and lots of money always makes politics and is a national and international level. these days I spoke with a prominent Italian politician who lives in the world of banking. know what I said? mafia that was faster than the industries and is already investing hundreds of billions, the result of the gains made with the drug, in the eastern countries ... they are already buying newspapers and private television stations, industries and hotels ... Those investments will become even precise and specific policy actions affect us, affect us all. Palermo After the carnage of the American police came to investigate in Sicily for that too, know about these huge investments, made ​​regularly by the banks ". [10]
Years later, the former minister Scotti Cirino Pomicino to confess: "It all started from a confidential communication made ​​to me by the chief of police Parisi, on the basis of intelligence work done by Sisde and supported by information confidential, spoke of international meetings in which would have been decided either by destabilizing actions mafia attacks with both criminal investigations against the leaders of the ruling parties. "

One of the meetings was talking about Scotti took place on June 2, 1992, on the yacht Britannia, sailing along the coast of Sicily. On the yacht there were some members of the Anglo-American power elite, as the British royals and the great bankers of the banks that will be addressed to the Italian Government during the privatization (Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and Salomon Brothers).
At that meeting it was decided to buy the Italian companies and the Bank of Italy, and how to bring down the old political system for insediarne another, completely manipulated by the new masters. At that meeting was also attended by several Italians, as Mario Draghi, then deputy director of the Ministry of the Treasury, the leader of the Eni Beniamino Andreatta and the manager of IRI Riccardo Galli.Gli intrigue decided on the Britannia would have allowed the Anglo-Americans to put hands on 48% of Italian companies, among which were the Buitoni, the Locatelli, the Negroni, the Ferrarelle, Perugina ela Galbani.
The press was hammering on the "Clean Hands", hinting that big changes were caused by that event.
In June 1992, settled the government of Giuliano Amato. It was a character in harmony with the speculators who wanted to take possession of Italy. In fact, Amato, to begin privatizations, hastened to refer to the center of the international financial power: the three big banks on Wall Street, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and Salomon Brothers.
Just came to power, Amato became the state bodies in joint-stock company, taking advantage of the Decree Law 386/1991, so that the financial elite could control them, and then detect.

The beginning was concerted by the International Monetary Fund, which, as he had done in other countries, wanted to privatize wildly and devalue our currency in order to facilitate economic domination and financial elite. The task of bringing down the Italian economy was given to George Soros, an American citizen through information received by the Rothschilds, with the complicity of some Italian authorities, managed to bring down our currency and the actions of many Italian companies.
Soros was commissioned by the Anglo-American bankers, to implement a series of speculations, effective thanks to the information that he received financial elite. He made speculative attacks by hedge funds to collapse the lira. Because of these attacks, on November 5, 1993, the lira lost 30% of its value, and in later years suffered write-downs.
The networks of the Rothschild Bank, through the Director Richard Katz, laid hands on Eni, which was sold off. The Rothschild Group also played a prominent role on the other privatizations, including that of the Bank of Italy. There were close ties between the Quantum Fund with George Soros and the Rothschilds. But also many other members of the Anglo-American financial elite, as Alfred Hartmann and Georges C. Karlweis, were involved in the processes of privatization of state companies and the Bank of Italy.
The Rothschild Spa Italy, the Milan branch of the Rothschild & Sons of London, was created in 1989, under the direction of Richard Katz. The latter became director of Soros's Quantum Fund in the period of speculation against the lira. Soros had been instructed by the Rothschilds to implement a series of speculation against the pound, the German mark and the pound, to destabilize the European Monetary System. On behalf of these clients, he made several speculations against the currencies of several Asian countries, such as Indonesia and Malaysia. After the financial destruction of Europe and Asia, Soros was commissioned to create a network for the distribution of drugs in Europe.

As a result, the Rothschilds, faithful to the way they do, they tried to topple the responsibility of the Italian economic collapse on someone else. Through a series of articles published in the Financial Times, accused Germany, arguing that the Bundesbank had implemented steps of insider trading against the pound. The prosecution did not stand, because the benefits of the collapse of the lira and the sell-off of Italian companies went to Anglo-Americans.
Privatisation has been a sack, which still continues. Explain Paolo Raimondi, the Solidarity Movement:
We've had years of privatization, looting of the productive economy and the bursting of the bubble of financial derivative. This same strategy of destabilization again today, when continental Europe is re-drawn, though not as a promoter and with prospects yet to be determined, in large infrastructure project base of the Bridge of the Eurasian Development. [11]
A few years later the Italian judiciary proceed against Soros, but without any success. In October 1995, the president of the International Movement for Civil Rights-Solidarity, Paolo Raimondi, filed a complaint to the judiciary to open an investigation into the speculative activities of Soros & Co., which had struck the lyre. The speculative attack by Soros, had allowed him to take possession of 15,000 billion lire. To counter the attack, the then governor of the Bank of Italy, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, burned needlessly $ 48 billion.
On Soros investigated by the Public Prosecutors of the Republic of Rome and Naples, which also shed light on the activities of the Bank of Italy in the period of the collapse of the pound. Soros was accused of market manipulation and insider trading, having used confidential information that enabled him to speculate with security and to anticipate the movements of stocks, exchange rates and currency values​​.

Explain the President and the General Secretary of the "International Movement for Civil Rights - Solidarity" during the complaint against Soros:
It was recorded in 1992 ... 's existence ... of a very close contact and particularly Mr. Soros Gerald Carrigan, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which is part of the apparatus of the Central American Bank, a place of maximum circulation of economic information confidential, which, oddly enough, once resigned from this place, was then immediately hired full-time by the financial "Goldman Sachs & co." as president of the international advisors. Goldman Sachs is one of the centers of great speculation on derivatives and currencies worldwide. Goldman Sachs is also involved in a direct way in the politics of privatization in Italy. In Italy also, Mr. Soros relies on the close cooperation of Mr. Isidoro Albertini, a former president of the stockbrokers of the Milan Stock Exchange and current president of the "Albertini and co. SIM" in Milan, one of the firms in the sector driving speculative derivatives. Albertini is a member of the board of the "Quantum Fund" with Soros.
III. The speculative attack on the pound in September 1992 was preceded and prepared by the famous meeting of 2 June 1992 on the yacht "Britannia" of Queen Elizabeth II of England, where the highest representatives of international finance, especially British, engaged in the great speculation derivatives, such as SG Warburg, Barings and the like, they were met by the other party led by Italian Mario Draghi, Director general of the Ministry of the Treasury, and the future Minister Beniamino Andreatta, to organize the privatization of the Italian state. In the wake of speculation against the lira and its immediate devaluation of 30%, MISUSE privatization would be done at bargain prices, to the benefit of international finance at the expense of the interests of the Italian state and the national economy and employment. Strangely, the same participants at the Britannia had already been approved by government men as Mario Draghi, to study and plan the privatization itself. Here we refer to as the Warburg, Morgan Stanley, to name two of the best known examples. The news agency EIR (Executive Intelligence Review) has publicly denounced this sordid business in late 1992, causing a series of parliamentary questions and policy discussions that have had the merit of questioning the whole process, rather unique, privatization. [12]
His accomplices were Italian Treasury Minister Piero Barucci, the then Director of the Bank of Italy Lamberto Dini and the then governor of the Bank of Italy, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi. More responsibility must be to the then Prime Minister Giuliano Amato and the Director General of the Treasury Mario Draghi. Some Italian authorities (as Dini) did a double game: denouncing the dangers but secretly supported the speculators.
Amato had forced the unions to accept a wage agreement is not convenient to the workers, for the "need to remain in the European Monetary System", knowing that Italy would come out because of the upcoming speculation.
The attacks continued for the Italian economy all the nineties, until the Italian economic-financial system did not fall under the complete control of the elite. In January 1996, the semi-annual report on information policy and security, the Prime Minister Lamberto Dini said:
Foreign exchange markets and stock exchanges of the major global markets continue to record current speculation to the detriment of our currency, originate, especially in delicate passages of the political and institutional life, the uncontrolled spread of unfounded news regarding the governmental structures and advances in data object of regular communications on consumer prices ... you can expect the recurrence of fraudulent speculation, given the persistence of a business cycle and internal deadlines of monetary unification. [13]

The next day, the Governor of the Bank of Italy, Antonio Fazio, reported that Italy could not do anything against the current speculative foreign exchange markets because "if the issuing banks are trying to change direction or stop the wind (financial transactions) do not make it to the size of the moving masses in the markets with respect to their ability to focus. "
Our authorities denounced the international power elite, but threw in the towel, believing those inevitable events. At stake was the future of the economic and financial hub, but no Italian authorities thought he could do something against attacks destabilizing Anglo-American elite.
The Solidarity Movement was the only one to report what was actually happening, pointing to the real culprits of the collapse of the Italian economy. On 28 June 1993, the Solidarity Movement held a conference in Milan, which made ​​known to all the meeting on Britannia and what it was derived. [14]
On 6 November 1993, 'then prime minister, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi wrote a letter to the Chief Prosecutor of the Republic of Rome, Vittorio Mele, to start "procedures relating to the offense provisions of art. 501 of the Criminal Code (" Rise and downward fraudulent prices on the public market or the stock exchanges of trade "), considered in the event of aggravating circumstances contained in it." Ciampi was evident also in the crime of insider trading by Soros, who had acted against the pound and the listed securities of our companies.

Even in later years other privatizations took place, without precise rules and prices please. That something was changing, the Italians understood by the change of name of the company, had become the Sip and Telecom Italian State Railways Trenitalia had become.
Legislative Decree 79/99 would have allowed the privatization of energy companies. In the field of gas and electricity appeared numerous private companies, today approximately 300 From 24 February 1998, also the Post Office became an Italian Spa Following the privatization of the postal, postal costs have increased dramatically and the postal workers are hired with temporary contracts. More than 400 post offices were closed, and those that remained open appear as points of sale rather than a service.
Our authorities justified the sale of privatization saying that one should "balance the public," but did not specify that it pay more money to the banks in exchange for bank notes that were worth as scrap paper. A win would have been only a few banks and entrepreneurs already rich (Benetton, Tronchetti Provera, Pirelli, Colaninno, Gnutti and a few others).
It was said that privatization would improve the management of the companies, but in fact, in all cases, there have been disasters of various kinds, and the remedy was paid for by Italian citizens.
Our companies have been sold off to farmers who almost always acted on behalf of the financial elite, from which they received the money for the purchase. The privatization of Telecom took place in October 1997 was sold to 11.82 billion euro, but eventually cashed in only 7.5 billion. The company was taken over by a group of entrepreneurs and banks., And the Treasury remained a market share of 3.5%.

The plan for the control of Telecom had hidden the director of Merrill Lynch, the American Banking Group of Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette and Chase Manhattan Bank.
At the end of 1998, the stock had lost 20% (4.33 euro). The elite banks, Chase Manhattan and the Lehman Brothers, came forward to implement a takeover bid. Through Colaninno, which received funding from the Chase Manhattan, became the owner of the Olivetti Telecom. The Olivetti was controlled by Bell, a company based in Luxembourg, which in turn controlled by the Hopa Emilio Gnutti and Roberto Colaninno.
The title, which during the bid had been pushed up to 20 euro, within a year was halved. After a few years will end up under three euro.
In 2001 Telecom was experiencing serious difficulties, the shares continued to fall. The Bell of Gnutti and Unipol Consort decided to sell a large part Tronchetti Provera their stake in Olivetti. The chairman of Pirelli, funded by JP Morgan, gained control of Telecom, through the financial Olympia, created by the Benetton family (supported by Banca Intesa and Unicredit).
After ten years since the privatization of Telecom, the budget is a disaster from every point of view: more than 20,000 people have been laid off, equities have lost a lot of money to savers, the costs to users are increased and the company is in loss .
Privatization, as well as a sack, it was also to be a way to cheat the small shareholders.
The Telecom, like many other companies, has placed its headquarters in foreign countries, not to pay taxes to the Italian State. In addition to losing companies, Italians were also deprived of tax revenues of those companies. The Bell, the company that controlled the Telecom Italy, had its headquarters in Luxembourg, and had within a company based in the Cayman Islands, which, as is known, are a tax haven.
Financial speculators base their activities on the existence of these tax havens, where you can not even get information to the judicial authorities. Tax havens have allowed speculators to destroy the economies of entire countries, yet the media never talk about this very serious problem.
Putting a company as important as the telephone in private hands also means protecting the privacy of citizens, which in fact has been repeatedly trampled, as it emerged in recent years.
Even for other privatizations, Highways, Italian Post Office, etc. Trenitalia., There were the same devastation: layoffs, fraud to the detriment of investors, service degradation, waste of public funds, mismanagement and problems of various kinds.
The Benetton family has become the majority shareholder of Highways. The contract for the privatization of Autostrade only gave advantages to buyers, making remain the burden of maintenance on the backs of taxpayers.

The Benetton have earned quite a lot 'of money thanks to the merger of Autostrade with the Spanish group Abertis. The merger took place with the complicity of the Prodi government, which after a summit with Zapatero, has decided to authorize it. Antonio Di Pietro, Minister for Infrastructure, was opposed, but eventually bowed to protests European Union and the policy of the President of the Council.
Despite the disasters of privatization, our government authorities have no intention to re-nationalize businesses to collapse, in fact, are willing to use public money to repair the damage caused by private individuals.
The company Trenitalia has been brought to the brink of bankruptcy. In a few years the service has become more and more poor, more and more trains are dirty, the cost of tickets continues to rise and are numerous inefficiencies. Because of staff reductions (for example, there is no longer the driver), there have been several incidents (even fatal). In 2006, the 'CEO of Trenitalia, Mauro Moretti, was presented at a hearing of the Committee on Public Works of the Senate, to cash in, confessing a hole one billion seven hundred million euro, which could lead the company to bankruptcy . In October 2006, the Minister of Transport, Alessandro Bianchi, approved the recapitalization plan proposed by Trenitalia. More public money to a company privatized reduced to ruin.
Behind all this there was the elite economic and financial (Morgan, Schiff, Harriman, Kahn, Warburg, Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc..) That acted preparing a draft devastation of the Italian economy, and it has implemented making use of political, financiers and entrepreneurs. Hiding is easy in a system in which banks or companies can take control of other companies or banks. This means that it is always difficult to really understand who controls the privatized companies. It 'similar to the game of Chinese boxes, as explained by Joseph Turani: "Colaninno & Associates control to 51% Hopa, which controls 56.6% of Bell, which controls 13.9% of Olivetti, which controls 70% of Tecnost, which controls 52% of Telecom ". [15] Numerous companies of Italian entrepreneurs have been destroyed by the system of financial markets, such as the Cirio and Parmalat. These companies have defrauded investors by selling corporate bonds ("Bonds") with a high degree of risk. The Parmalat bonds issued for a value of € 7 billion, and at the same time attuò speculative financial transactions, and near bankruptcy. In order not to bring down the value of the shares (and to sell others) wore makeup budgets.
The national and international banks claimed the situation as beneficial to them, and the rating agency, Standard & Poor's has decided to downgrade the Parmalat only when the fraud was known to all.
I cheated investors have launched legal proceedings against Calisto Tanzi, Fausto Tonna, Coloniale Spa(società della famiglia Tanzi), Citigroup, Inc. (società finanziaria americana), Buconero LLC (società che faceva capo a Citigroup), Zini & Associates (una compagnia finanziaria americana), Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (organizzazione che forniva consulenza e servizi professionali), Deloitte & Touche SpA (società di revisione contabile), Grant Thornton International (società di consulenza finanziaria) e Grant Thornton S.p.a.(società incaricata della revisione contabile del sottogruppo Parmalat S.p.a.).
La Cirio era gestita dalla Cragnotti & Partners. I "Partners" non erano altro che una serie di banche nazionali e internazionali. La Cirio emise Bond per circa 1.125 milioni di Euro. Molte di queste obbligazioni venivano utilizzate dalle banche per spillare denaro ai piccoli risparmiatori. Tutto questo avveniva in perfetta armonia col sistema finanziario, che non offre garanzie di onestà e di trasparenza.
Grazie alle privatizzazioni, un gruppo ristretto di ricchi italiani ha acquisito somme enormi, e ha permesso all'élite economico-finanziaria anglo-americana di esercitare un pesante controllo, sui cittadini, sulla politica e sul paese intero.
Agli italiani venne dato il contentino di "Mani Pulite", che si risolse con numerose assoluzioni e qualche condanna a pochi anni di carcere.
A causa delle privatizzazioni e del controllo da parte della Banca Centrale Europea, il paese è più povero e deve pagare somme molto alte per il debito. Ogni anno viene varata la finanziaria, allo scopo di pagare le banche e di partecipare al finanziamento delle loro guerre. Mentre la povertà aumenta, come la disoccupazione, il lavoro precario, il degrado e il potere della mafia.
Il nostro paese è oggi controllato da un gruppo di persone, che impongono, attraverso istituti propagandati come "autorevoli" (Fondo Monetario Internazionale e Banca Centrale Europea), di tagliare la spesa pubblica, di privatizzare quello che ancora rimane e di attuare politiche non convenienti alla popolazione italiana. I nostri governi operano nell'interesse di questa élite, e non in quello del paese.

references:

[1] http://www.reti-invisibili.net/georgofili/
[2] La Repubblica , 27 maggio 1992.
[3] La Repubblica , 28 maggio 1992.
[4] La Repubblica , 10 giugno 1992.
[5] La Repubblica , 23 giugno 1992.
[6] La Repubblica , 23 giugno 1992.
[7] La Repubblica , 25 giugno 1992.
[8] La Repubblica , 27 maggio 1992.
[9] La Repubblica , 11 agosto 1992.
[10] L'Unità, 12 agosto 1992.
[11] Solidarietà, anno IV n. 1, febbraio 1996.
[12] Esposto della Magistratura contro George Soros presentato dal Movimento Solidarietà al Procuratore della Repubblica di Milano il 27 ottobre 1995.
[13] Servizio per le Informazioni e la Sicurezza Democratica , Rivista N. 4 gennaio-aprile 1996.
[14] Solidarietà, anno 1, n. 1, ottobre 1993.
[15] La Repubblica , 5 settembre 1999.



SOURCE